Taking anyone’s life is usually a heinous crime that devastates families, communities, and society as a whole. The severe punishment serves as a deterrent to prospective offenders and seeks to copyright the sanctity of human life.
As a result of recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been doable under the previous Edition on the law.
limitation of liability on the extent of the cap provided by the registered mortgage deed(Banking Law)
twelve. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons acquiring their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a method out or guise to perform absent with the candidature from the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID demanded) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts to the purpose of confirming of an individual’s date of birth.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may possibly interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mould the relief to make it correct to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified via the decision from the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's very well-settled that whilst thinking of the case of regular promotion here of civil servants, the competent authority should evaluate the merit of the many suitable candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of suitable candidates who are found to get most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded from the respondent department just to extend favor to your blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part on the respondent department.
whether when granting promotion senior employees were thought of for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
Typically, only an appeal accepted with the court of previous resort will resolve this kind of differences and, for many reasons, these types of appeals will often be not granted.
VI) The petitioner is powering the bars because arrest, investigation with the case is complete, he isn't any more demanded to the purpose of investigation and at this stage to help keep him at the rear of the bars before conclusion of trial will provide no handy purpose.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses for instance self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may perhaps bring about reduced charges or acquittal.
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by regulation." It really is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to maximizing the effectiveness in the legislation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are thoroughly different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--